top of page

Innovative Architecture: The Power of a Hybrid Approach with SAP Group Reporting for Consolidation and Best-of-Breed Tools for Planning

  • obconsultech
  • Apr 2
  • 4 min read

Updated: Apr 17


ree


In today’s enterprise finance landscape, transformation leaders frequently face a pivotal question: Should we unify consolidation and planning on one platform or deploy best-of-breed tools for each function? This debate has become even more relevant as SAP BPC approaches its end-of-life in 2027.


At the recent SAP Insider conference, a leading event for finance professionals to learn about SAP's latest innovations and best practices, many attendees asked: “How do we convince corporate consolidation teams to adopt SAP Group Reporting, especially when they're used to unified platforms for consolidation and planning?” This article outlines an innovative, pragmatic solution to that challenge.


While SAP Group Reporting is the definitive choice for consolidation, particularly for SAP-centric organizations, the same cannot be said for planning and budgeting. Opting for a third-party planning tool can improve flexibility, usability, and modeling depth outcomes.

Let’s delve into the strategic advantages of a hybrid architecture, which leverages SAP Group Reporting for consolidation and a best-in-class FP&A solution for planning. This approach empowers finance professionals to navigate the evolving landscape with confidence and foresight.


Why SAP Group Reporting Is the Gold Standard for Consolidation

1. Native Integration with SAP S/4HANA

  • Real-time access to Universal Journal (ACDOCA) data

  • Elimination of ETL layers and reconciliation efforts

  • Unified master data and hierarchies across ERP and consolidation

This results in streamlined close cycles and enhanced data integrity.

2. Built-In Consolidation Capabilities

  • Currency translation

  • Intercompany elimination

  • Investment consolidation

  • Entire audit trail and compliance monitoring

These features make Group Reporting a robust, enterprise-grade solution without relying on third-party add-ons.

3. Compliance and Governance Aligned with SAP Standards

  • Seamless integration with SAP GRC

  • Native support for SAP Identity and Access Management

  • Alignment with IFRS and local GAAP

This offers built-in risk mitigation for regulated industries. This built-in compliance is a significant plus for CFOs and controllers in controlled environments.

 

Where SAP Analytics Cloud (SAC) Planning Falls Short

While SAC Planning is tightly coupled with SAP systems, it lacks several critical capabilities compared to standalone FP&A platforms:

1. Functional Limitations

  • Lacks advanced capabilities like workforce planning with drivers, CapEx modeling, and scenario management

  • It is not ideal for organizations needing multi-dimensional, driver-based forecasting

2. User Experience Challenges

  • SAC’s modeling interface can feel restrictive for experienced finance users

  • Driver models are more complex to maintain and slower to process compared to tools like Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning

3. Adoption Barriers in Mixed System Landscapes

  • Limited appeal for business units not fully aligned with SAP

  • Less robust Excel integrations and end-user experience compared to alternatives

The Hybrid Strategy: Group Reporting + Best-of-Breed Planning Tools

Why It Works:

  • Consolidation stays within SAP Group Reporting, ensuring ERP-level auditability, compliance, and performance.

  • Planning is handled by a modern FP&A platform (Anaplan, OneStream, CCH Tagetik, etc.) that offers powerful modeling and an intuitive interface.

Integration Made Easy:

  • Connect using SAP BTP, OData APIs, or middleware like Boomi and MuleSoft.

  • Push actuals from S/4HANA to the planning tool; send budgets and forecasts back to Group Reporting for consolidation and variance analysis.

 

 

 

System Landscape: Hybrid Architecture for Consolidation and Planning

Below is a conceptual diagram that illustrates how SAP Group Reporting integrates with best-of-breed planning tools in a hybrid landscape:

                  +----------------------------------------------------------+

                  |     Advanced Planning Tools                             |

                  | (Anaplan, OneStream, Workday, CCH Tagetik, etc.)        |

                  +----------------------------------------------------------+

                   ^                                                  ^

                   |                                                  |

   Corporate Budget/Forecast Flow         <-->         Granular Planning Flow

                   |                                                  |

                   v                                                  v

      +-----------------------------------+         +-------------------------------------+

      |        SAP Group Reporting        | <---->  |    SAP S/4HANA Universal Journal    |

      |        (Consolidation Layer)      |         |             (ACDOCA)               |

      +-----------------------------------+         +-------------------------------------+

Key Benefits of This Architecture: This hybrid architecture enables bidirectional data flows between systems, optimizes consolidation and planning within their best-fit environments, enhances collaboration between FP&A and corporate finance, and reduces reconciliation efforts and manual intervention. These benefits should convince you of the effectiveness and optimism of this approach.

  • Enables bidirectional data flows between systems, ensuring that data is always up-to-date and reducing the need for manual data entry.

  • Consolidation and planning each optimized within their best-fit environments

  • Enhance collaboration between FP&A and corporate finance.

  • Reduces reconciliation efforts and manual intervention

Key Benefits of This Architecture:

  • Enables dedicated planning tools to feed both detailed and summary-level financial data

  • Maintains SAP-native strengths for consolidation and auditability

  • Reduces reconciliation errors and accelerates financial cycles

Key Benefits of This Architecture:

  • Maintains SAP-native strengths for consolidation

  • Enables flexible, modern planning tools for FP&A

  • Reduces reconciliation errors by integrating at the source

Let SAP Do What It Does Best—and Let Planning Tools Do the same. In conclusion, the recommended approach is to leverage SAP Group Reporting for consolidation and purpose-built planning platforms, ensuring each function operates at its best.

While the allure of a single-vendor solution is strong, consolidation and planning have distinct needs.

  • Use SAP Group Reporting for what it excels at: real-time, compliant, and integrated consolidation.

  • Pair it with a purpose-built planning platform for strategic forecasting, budgeting, and scenario modeling.

This approach delivers the best of both worlds, empowering CFOs and FP&A teams with tools supporting governance and agility. It's a strategy that ensures SAP Group Reporting and purpose-built planning platforms are used to their full potential, enhancing your financial management capabilities.

Ready to streamline your BPC transition and modernize your finance architecture? Let’s collaborate to build a tailored migration roadmap that aligns with your business goals—whether you're consolidating SAP Group Reporting or exploring next-gen planning platforms.

📩 Connect with us at info@obconsultech.com🌐 Visit www.obconsultech.com

Optimize. Automate. Elevate!

 

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page